Limits on the questioning of judicial nominees are reflected even in the questionnaire that this committee submits to nominees. Let me quote the rule: Has anyone -- or the question, rather:
Now, Judge Roberts answered in the negative to that question, and I think it would be ironic indeed if the committee were now to demand that the nominee take stands on questions that may come before him as a member of the court.
Now, not only would it violate this committee's standards and procedures for a nominee to answer questions about issues that may come before him as a judge, it would also be unethical for the nominee to answer such questions.
Well, the code of judicial ethics draws no such distinctions.
Occasional quotes from blogs, news, movies, books, overheard conversations
defender of fame-whores
Hater of New Blogger--thanks for nothing, Google
Still not sure what this blog is about, but whatever it IS about it's done well - XWL
"That Bill. Subversive. Sharp. Watch out for him. Misses nothing. A dots-connector." - reader_iam
Bill -- you have just won yourself a WGA-arbitrated credit
Tuesday, September 13, 2005
Opening statement - Kyl
Using MS Word to summarize Kyl's opening statement:
No comments:
Post a Comment